Post what you need and writers bid on it. Before the work reaches you, an independent reviewer checks it against a quality checklist. Your money stays held until you accept.
Free to post. You only pay once you've chosen a writer.
Most platforms hand you whatever the freelancer sends and leave you to judge it. We put a reviewer in between.
A reviewer is paid for the judgement, not the outcome. They get the same fee whether they pass the work or send it back, so nobody has a reason to wave something through.
Everyone here is one of these. Knowing which you are tells you most of what you need about how the site works.
Post a brief, set a budget, and pick from the writers who bid. You never have to chase a draft. The site tells you when it's your turn.
Bid on what suits you, or get hired directly. Your record is built from what you actually delivered, not just from stars.
Every submission comes to you before the client sees it. You check it against a fixed list, then pass it or send it back with your reasons.
Short answers. Nothing buried in terms.
It shouldn't reach you, because a reviewer checks it first. If it still isn't right, ask for changes. The writer isn't paid until you accept.
Every writer gives us photo ID before they can bid, checked by hand. You see their rating and their first-pass rate, which comes from reviewer decisions rather than opinion.
Yes. Browse the directory, invite someone to a private task, and agree a price in chat. It never goes on the public board.
A flat monthly subscription, and nothing per job beyond the standard split. Free while we're getting started.
Writers browsing the board, and the reviewer. Delivered files are locked until review passes. Your private budget is seen by nobody but you.
Either side files a withdrawal. Both put their case, an administrator reads the evidence and decides how the money splits.
It costs nothing to post a task and read the bids. You decide whether to go ahead after that.
